The reverse narrative style provides an ambitious and interesting way of considering the Holocaust - a period of almost inconceivable human cruelty - which is perhaps best understood by an irregular or surreal form. Doctors who served in the concentration camps reported that they believed themselves to be doing humanity a kindness; removing malignant tissue for the good of the body as a whole. In reverse, the atrocities take on a new poignancy - described in almost biblical terms - and the narrative becomes a comment on the Nazi’s perverse understanding of progress. As the narrative advances we learn more of Tod (Odilo), but it’s not until we reach Auschwitz that, poignantly, everything begins to fall into place. It becomes clear that the split in Odilo’s personality, his sexual (and moral) impotence, and his desire to dominate others, are all rooted in his experiences at Auschwitz. When returned to the most significant period of both the century and his life, Odilo thrives in the homosocial environment of the camp, and morphs into the confident young man he once was. Compared to Odilo, who holds several identities during the course of the novel, The Jews at Aushwitz are treated as a mass; a faceless people. In a sense as the 'other'.
The narrator’s bafflement at the world indicates that he is the part of Odilo’s split personality that avoided Nazi indoctrination, that remained appalled by the atrocities committed during the Holocaust. However, the narrator is not honest with the reader, at times he is the uncomprehending victim, at others he is aware of the situation. There is certainly an abdication of responsibility present, a form of denial.
Whilst it takes a little time to familiarise one’s self to the unusual style, Amis gently breaks the reader in, striking a lighter, comedic tone during the novel’s opening chapters. The reverse dialogue too takes some getting used to, and one is often forced to read it both as it’s printed and then again in reverse to fully appreciate the implications of the conversation. Amis cites a scene in Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five as his main stylistic influence and, whilst others such as Harold Pinter, Sarah Waters, and Don DeLillo, have reversed time in an episodic manner, no one had attempted anything a complex as Time's Arrow. The unique style forces the reader to engage with the world they are presented with in an unconventional way, forces them to new heights of perception. However, whilst the form is conscientiously created, the plot itself is unextraordinary and, were it to be read forwards, would prove a little dull. That Time's Arrow is a short novel negates this fact to an extent, but it is nevertheless present.
Given the subject and the style, writing a book like Time's Arrow is brave and involves a great deal of craft, but one is left with the feeling that the realisation of the concept is not quite the tour de force it could have been. There was criticism of the book on its release, and it opens an interesting debate as to who 'owns' the Holocaust; who has the right to discuss it. Certainly, there are jokes in the book that, for some readers, will feel a little cheap to sit in the same book as the Holocaust, but perhaps this points to the fact that nothing is sacred, that life goes on, in all its banality, with disregard for sacrosanctity. Although ironies that arise due to the reverse narrative are initially lighter in tone, they become increasingly dark as the narrative moves towards the barbarism of Auschwitz. In a sense Amis is mirroring the Nazis own misuse of language, in their case to justify mass-murder, and this fits into the many dualities in the novel. When he talks of Time's Arrow in relation to the Holocaust, one gets the impression that Amis is fully aware and sensitive to the implications of writing about the topic. He cites one of his main influences in writing Time's Arrow as Robert Jay Lifton’s book, The Nazi Doctors, a non-fiction exploration of the psychology of the doctors who disregarded the Hippocratic oath and committed numerous murders during the Holocaust, and it is evident that Amis has approached the rsearch and writing of Time's Arrow in a thorough manner.
The novel’s conclusion is left open, with it unclear whether or not Odilo and the narrator will now live life forwards – forever oscillating between the past and the present, never allowing the reader to fully escape the implications of the novel, and suggesting that, not only should the Holocaust be remembered always, but that it may happen again. Indeed, that Tod’s journey might be a mirror inversion of Amis’s own generation’s journey towards a nuclear holocaust.
Reviews of Time's Arrow on Amazon (UK)
Reviews of Time's Arrow on Amazon (US)
You Might Also Enjoy...
|Review: London Fields by Martin Amis|
London Fields (1989) is a murder mystery, in reverse. Set in London in 1999, with an undefined crisis on the horizon, the story follows the sexually savvy Nicola Six, who has a premonition about her own death, as she tries to identify and entice her murderer... [Read More]
|Review: Money by Martin Amis|
Money (1984) is a satirical snapshot of the consumerist culture that permeated the 1980s told through the eyes of John Self - a man obsessed with money, sex, fighting, and alcohol. The novel follows Self as he gropes through the world, desperately... [Read More]
|Review: Martin Amis: The Biography by Richard Bradford|
Martin Amis: The Biography (2011) is the first biography of one of Britain's pre-eminent novelists of the late-twentieth century. Famous as much for his lifestyle as for his literary achievements, Martin Amis is a hugely provocative and controversial writer... [Read More]