Gide was strongly influenced by Nietzsche and The Immoralist is an existential inquiry into the nature and purpose of being. Building on Nietzsche’s idea that creativity should be man’s highest aspiration, Gide considers what it costs a man to throw off the shackles of Christian morality. Michel’s struggle with the morals that are imposed upon him speaks to a wider quandary of man; that is, the extent to which one’s morals are shaped by one’s surroundings and social pressures, or by one’s innate sense of reality, and there is a constant grating between the will of Michel as the individual, and society as a whole. Gide uses Nietzsche’s interpretation of the Apollinian and Dionysian myths to shape Michel’s inner conflict: Michel represents a typically Apollinian character who has been educated and socialised so as to deny his Dionysian impulses. As he seeks the authentic, Michel moves towards the suppressed sensation-seeking side of his nature and embraces the Dionysian, albeit often vicariously through others. However, for all Michel’s desire to experience authentic existence, he turns to those who act against common morality and delights in their own non-conformity, rather than turning to and developing his own morality and transcending society’s standards. Throughout, his choices are based on reactions against the norm rather than towards his own accepted reality, and so the reader is never sure of Michel’s commitment to the experiences he seeks out.
For Michel, whose early life is shaped by the will of his father, there is a real sense that through the course of the narrative he steps away from the paternal shadow and establishes himself as a separate entity, disregarding the scholarly life for which his father provided the archetype. Beyond breaking from the shackles of society, he is breaking from his own father, as Freud would insist is a necessary part in a man’s evolution. By liberating his mind from the strictures of intellectual pursuit and allowing himself to be guided by sensation, Michel finds a more authentic experience, and embraces the moment rather than dwelling on the past. In this way Gide suggests that Michel’s scholarly pursuits have, as education will, forced him into conforming to narrow parameters, and that it is only through interacting with others that Michel is able to experience his epiphany. The book is concerned with the transition from ignorance to knowledge, but it is clear that Gide does not define this move down conventional lines. For Gide then, traditional education has its limits. Gide’s writing is economical, his easy prose belying the complexity of the themes woven into the narrative. This is an intimate psychological study of a man in crisis, and Gide, who himself lived through a cold marriage and was tortured by his own homosexuality, reported that the emotional energy he put into writing The Immoralist took a great toll on him. The prose rarely drifts from Michel’s personal evolution and this intimacy and un-distracted attention is one of The Immoralist’s strongest points.
Michel’s voice is that of an academic, whose verbal style is drawn from classical textbooks and from written communications – Gide clearly inhabiting his character’s psyche and drawing a complete portrait as such. Marceline, on the other hand, is a barely developed character, and acts more as a symbol for Michel to act against. As Michel’s independence grows, Marceline, who represents strict Christian morality and society as a whole, grows weaker. Michel fails to appreciate this inverse relationship until it is too late, too caught up in his own hedonistic search for authenticity to appreciate the consequences for those around him.
Gide offers no solution or fixed viewpoint in The Immoralist - he does not revel in Michel’s rebellion against common morality nor does he condemn him for it; the novel’s conclusion leaves only a sense of emptiness. For Michel a life without morals in practice proves all but impossible, and certainly cannot fill the existential void – he has felt the consequences of a life lived against common morality and is left without answers. Unable to live with his freedom Michel instead looks to his friends to help him restore balance in his life. Through Michel, Gide asks simply if a life without restraint has any true value, the closest he comes to answering is through words he puts into Michel’s mouth, “The capacity to get free is nothing; the capacity to be free, that is the task”.
Reviews of The Immoralist on Amazon (UK)
Reviews of The Immoralist on Amazon (US)
|Review: Hunger by Knut Hamsun|
Hunger (1890), Sult in the original Norwegian, is the story of an unnamed journalist who haunts the streets of Christiana (now Oslo), treading the fine line between existence and death. Maintaining his high ideals, he refuses help while he struggles... [Read More]
|Review: The Outsider by Albert Camus|
The Outsider (1942) is one of the best known existential novels, and Albert Camus's early attempt to grapple with absurdism, and relay it in an abstract, accessible form. The philosophical ruminations are embodied by... [Read More]