Review: Einstein's Monsters by Martin Amis
Einstein’s Monsters (1987) is a collection of five short stories about living in a nuclear world, the paranoia and sickening reality of nuclear armament and its destructive potential. The unprecedented scale and ferocity of this reality is almost impossible to conceptualise in fiction but Martin Amis’s strange and halting stories grope for some form of expression which begins to ‘deal’ with the nuclear question. From monstrous dogs to schizophrenic teens, a philosophical strong man to an omniscient spectator that pays witness to our destruction, this is a violent, unusual response to the overwhelming anxiety of Amis’s time.
‘Einstein’s Monsters’ refers, of course, to both nuclear weapons and us, human beings. In our age of irony, the greatest irony is that of Einsteinian knowledge: both the twentieth century's biggest leap forward in the understanding of the cosmos and the biggest threat to our continuing existence. As one of the characters would have it:
All peculiarly modern ills, all fresh distortions and distempers, Bujak attributed to one thing: Einsteinian knowledge, knowledge of the strong force. It was his central paradox that the greatest - the purest, the most magical - genius of our time should have introduced the earth to such squalor, profanity, and panic.
Amis understands the potential threat of scientific discovery, wonderful and progressive though it can be. When combined with human nature all knowledge is corruptible and inevitably dangerous.
Martin Amis is a man of the nuclear generation, and his own anxiety and unease hangs heavy on Einstein’s Monsters. The opening essay, which introduces the collection, powerfully conveys the complexities of nuclear weaponry. In truth, this essay is rather heavy handed, and reading it can feel like being bludgeoned over the head until one agrees that one agrees about something which one quite possibly agreed with in the first place. That said, it does put forward the case forcefully.
The strongest section of the essay is Amis’s description of the sickness he feels at the thought of nuclear weaponry and this section sets the tone for the collection well. What follows is a series of short stories that convey the ominous seriousness of the situation (as Amis sees it) but in which his writing never quite hits its stride. There are glimpses of his best, certainly, but the heavy theme of the collection appears to have convinced him to set aside his usual deft linguistic flourishes.
As Amis states in his introduction to the collection, writing about nuclear weapons was important at the time these stories came to him and, he felt, there was a dearth of successful attempts at that point. Whether Einstein’s Monsters is the response Amis felt was necessary is debatable but its texture begins to grapple with an untameable, irreversible problem which we, as the children of a nuclear world, all face indefinitely. At a time when the nuclear paranoia, rightly or wrongly, is a less forceful part of day-to-day life for most, Amis's writing captures the full horror of existing in a world in which nuclear weapons exist, in which one is at all times on the verge of a global holocaust.
4 Comments
Thanks for the review. I've always had trouble getting into his work though I do like his father's writing. The subject matter of this one sounds too interesting to pass up, though.
ReplyDeleteI'd be interested to hear how you get on if you do give it a try. In honesty, I suspect if you haven't like Amis up to this point, then this might not be the book to convert you. It's an interesting take on the Nuclear question though.
ReplyDeleteDear Matthew,
ReplyDeleteI read your review of Martin Amis book Einstein's Monsters and feel that you did a great job. In my judgment, your review was balanced, fair and well-thought out. You have demonstrated a justified objectivity, giving a reader a clear impression of what to expect from the novel. I will be following your other reviews with interest.
Thanks!
Hi Renz - thanks for taking a look at the blog, and glad you found the review fair. I can't promise complete objectivity, but I do my best not to be too biased (even if I love Martin Amis a little bit ;) ).
ReplyDeleteI always welcome comments...